Courtesy of El País, we have had a look at the letter – and we thought it was worth translating a few key points:
- The first priority identified by the ECB and the Bank of Spain is labour market reform. The letter reads, “We deem it necessary to adopt additional measures that improve the functioning of the labour market […] We are enormously concerned about the fact that the [Spanish] government has not adopted any measure to abolish inflation-indexing clauses. Such clauses are not an appropriate element for the labour markets in a monetary union, as they represent a structural obstacle to the adjustment of labour costs.”
- The letter goes on, “The government should also adopt exceptional measures to promote wage moderation in the private sector [...] We suggest revising other labour market regulations shortly, with a view at speeding up the re-integration of unemployed people in the labour market [...] We see important advantages in the adoption of a new exceptional work contract that is applied for a limited period of time, and where compensation for dismissal is very low.”
- The second priority is the adoption of “bold measures to ensure the sustainability of public finances. The government should prove in a clear manner, by action, its unconditional commitment to the achievement of its fiscal policy targets, irrespective of the economic situation. To this end, we urge the government to announce, by the end of this month, additional measures of structural fiscal consolidation for the remainder of 2011 worth at least more than 0.5% of GDP.” “Simultaneously”, continues the text, “the application of national fiscal norms must be continued in order to ensure [central] control over regional and local budgets (including the authorisation for debt emissions by regional governments).”
- The third priority is product market reform. According to the letter, the Spanish government should “increase the competitiveness of the energy sector in order for prices to better reflect the cost of energy” and “increase the competitiveness of the services sector, in particular by addressing the regulation of professional services.”
All this put the ECB squarely in the realm of domestic fiscal policy, somewhere many would agree it should not be. In any case, any country considering applying for an OMT bond-buying programme should consider these points when wondering how prescriptive the conditionality might be.
The closing paragraph of the letter sounds a lot like a warning. It reads, “We are confident that the [Spanish] government is aware of its highest responsibility in the good functioning of the eurozone in the current [economic] conjunction, and that it will adopt in a decisive manner the necessary measures to regain the confidence of the markets in the sustainability of its policies. Such measures […] should greatly benefit not only the Spanish economy, but also the eurozone as a whole.”
Therefore, it is no surprise that many of the letter’s ‘suggestions’ have become government policy – though under the centre-right cabinet led by Mariano Rajoy, who took office at the end of 2011.
1 comment:
The thing that might be the most noteworthy and appalling about what happened is that it appears to be fully legal....
If it was legal, should it continue to be legal?
Maybe there'll be consequences but in the unlikely event that there'll be consequences for wrongdoing will any individual be held responsible?
EU-insitutions are claimed to be transparent and accountable. But, the transparency is due to leaks, the accountability is socialised and dispersed so much that decisionmakers are in fact completely immune to any attempt to hold them accountable.
Unsustainable situation. Reform and get some real transparency and accountability.
Post a Comment