"will face a tougher challenge over the next few years because of the possibility of a prolonged lack of spare power station capacity."Very true, but this should have come as no surprise to anyone - Ofgem was already highlighting a serious generation gap in its October 2012 assessment - as others have for many years. To cut a long story short policy decisions (and the lack of policy decisions) over decades mean that, in Ofgem's assessment, by 2016/17 the excess capacity of UK electricity generation over demand is predicted to fall to just 5%. And that is a mid-point estimate - so if demand is higher (a cold winter), there are delays in building new gas plants or a problem with existing plants, there will be even greater problems dealing with peak demand.
In the short term this problem is exacerbated by EU environmental laws that require the closure of large coal plants. This is in addition to the closure of nuclear plants which are coming to the end of their lives.
This is a looming problem for the UK and something politicians of all stripes should be aware of given the political resonance of higher fuel bills and the possibility of black outs. Other than building more coal or gas plants, immediate action could require the UK to seek to renegotiate its legally binding commitments with the EU, something that has been highlighted by the EU Fresh Start Group of MPs.
The UK's electricity generation at the moment:
DECC 2010 |
Ofgem highlights that on a midpoint prediction the UK will only have a 5% safety threshold |
Credit Suisse |
Firstly we have the failure of domestic policy. E
Kingsnorth coal power station due to be closed by EU emissions legislation |
The problem needs a solution in two parts. Firstly the UK needs a huge amount of investment in new generation capacity of all flavours.
“Around a quarter of existing power plants in the UK are due to close by 2020. Replacing this capacity will require up to £110 billion of investment in new generation and grid connections by 2020. Compared with the last decade, rates of capital expenditure on energy infrastructure will need to double."A second option to escape the short term generation crunch brought on by the EU's LCPD could be to seek to negotiate for a UK opt-out or extension from the Directive. This could for instance come in the form of a limited exemption for a number of hours at times of peak demand. The problem with this is the Directive is legally binding and so would require other EU states to agree.
Will the Coalition attempt to re-negotiate a partial exemption? Well it is clear that a large number of Conservative MPs are becoming wary of how higher fuel bills and possible blackouts could reflect on them in the next election. The EU Fresh Start group of MPs has for instance called for the renewables and LCPD to be reviewed. This is what their manifesto says:
"The UK should renegotiate, or, if unsuccessful, suspend its obligations under the 2009 Renewables Directive, and not sign up to further commitments with respect to renewable energy targets. Our own roadmap (which would replace it) should maximise the cost efficacy of the reduction measures taken."
"We should review the timescale of the Large Combustion Plant and Industrial Emissions Directives with particular reference to the requirement to close down our large coal burning stations. To the extent we believe that premature closure is causing an unacceptable impact on fuel poverty or energy network resilience, we should extend their lives. We should make it clear to our EU partners that the large scale construction of unabated coal stations while we switch ours off is not a fair or an acceptable position."Will this happen? Well David Cameron's commitment to re-negotiation is only for the post 2015 Parliament which might be too late. So could there be a case for early action? Yes, but immediate action seems unlikely, at least for as long as the lights are still on. Both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have reiterated their support for legally binding renewables targets and if Labour were to return to Government they were the party that originally put them in place!
So, expect to hear more about the looming energy crunch and expect the political temperature to increase.
2 comments:
Well,
"In an ideal world, the Government would disregard the European Commission’s emissions strictures on grounds of pressing need"
says the Telegraph View today.
From which I conclude that the Telegraph leader writer implicitly believes that we could never be a self-governing country except "in an ideal world"; it's a kind of utopian dream which we must set aside, instead accepting the dystopia of government by the EU as being the best option available to us in a less than ideal world.
I suspect Andrea Leadsom MP and her so-called "Fresh Start" group also believe much the same thing, but are looking for a few palliatives to ease the constant nagging pain of EU membership.
Today in the Telegraph - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/letters/ - there is a series of letters on this topic led by Tony Lodge, a Research Fellow at the Centre for Policy Studies who (inter alia) urges - - "David Cameron should now act in the national interest and deviate from the EU directive, instead keeping those coal and oil plants that are under sentence as an emergency energy reserve for the next five years, allowing them to be used when necessary to provide electricity.
The Government can still take the lead on this issue, but time is tight. Will it act?"
This is a real crisis which could still be stopped (unlike the trivial horsemeat hoo-hah which is wrong but doesn;t appear to have harned a single soul in the least!)
Incidentally the letters unclude one from John Hayes the Minister of State for Energy which is not in his normal robust frame of mind but reads like a civil service draft of total blandness.
This is a time for Cameron to ACT in the national interest TELLING the EU that we cannot comply with these undertakings for if we did we would ruin our country. No IFs - no BUTs - no PERHAPs - Just DO IT.
Post a Comment