• Facebook
  • Facebook
  • Facebook
  • Facebook

Search This Blog

Visit our new website.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

ECB's own budgetary discipline not inspiring confidence

With budgetary discipline the only game in town in the eurozone, it must have been a bit of an awkward moment at the ECB when they realised that the bank's new Frankfurt headquarters (pictured), currently under construction and due to be completed in 2014, will come in significantly over budget.

Executive board member Jörg Asmussen let the cat out of the bag in his welcome address at today's 'topping-out' ceremony, revealing in his welcome address that:
We are monitoring the construction progress, costs and price developments very closely, adjusting and adapting where necessary. As a public institution, we are committed to using our resources responsibly. This is essential. So far the ECB has spent approximately €530 million in construction and other costs, including the purchase of the site. In 2005 the overall investment cost was estimated at €850 million at 2005 constant prices. It is anticipated that increases in the price of construction materials and construction activities from 2005 until the completion of the project in 2014 will lead to a €200 million increase in the overall investment cost. 
In addition, there have been a number of unforeseen challenges that needed to be dealt with. The two major challenges unforeseen in 2005 were, first, that the original tender for a general contractor did not yield a satisfactory result and the ECB had to change to a different contractor model, and second, that the Grossmarkthalle – a large industrial heritage building from 1928 – presented a number of challenges that were not detected in the initial examination conducted prior to the acquisition:
  • the foundations turned out to be insufficient and required additional support; 
  • the roof coverage was found to be contaminated and therefore could not be disposed of as envisaged; 
  • and parts of the concrete construction had insufficient steel support.
These factors are likely to account for additional costs of about €100-150 million, or a 10-14% increase in the overall investment cost. The resulting delay in the construction works on the Grossmarkthalle, as well as the entrance building, has been incorporated into the existing time schedule.
So overall the total cost is likely to come in at around €1.2bn, a tidy sum of money, even at a time of multi-billion euro bailout funds. We estimate that the cost of the new building amounts to around half of the outstanding cuts the Greek coalition still has to make in its latest austerity package.

DPA notes that the new building will hold 2,300 personnel, seemingly large enough for a central bank. Although when you consider that the ECB is currently looking to take over the supervision of 6000 financial institutions - a job which national supervisors currently employ tens of thousands of people to do - one does wonder whether another new building could be needed in the near future. 

We can't say the ECB is setting a great example for austerity, especially given that is now a precondition for accessing its new bond-buying programme.


Blankfiend said...

Where are they going to relocate to when Germany leaves the EMU?

Rik said...

An office for 2300 people with the usual stuff around it say 70000 sqm., well lets round it off to 100000.
With construction costs of 12 000 Euro per sqm in between some German cows? Simply doesnot add up.
Or other costs are included. But 12000 Euro per sqm construction costs in farmland close to Ffurt no way.

Average Englishman said...

Rik's right. Rik's figures are very generous, so there's something very wrong with these costs. What's getting paid for on the side from this budget?

Rollo said...

An obscene waste of money

Anonymous said...

Speaking as a long-time UK taxpayer, I don't remember giving the private bankers who own and control the so-called European Central Bank permission to spend any of my money to pay for the contruction of their building.

Did I not get the memo?

christina Speight said...

Correct me if I'm wrong, Anonymous, but surely the eurozone members pay for this - or DO WE PAY too?

`In any case the IMF and the Commission and - er - the ECB are used to dealing severely with profligate spendthrifts.

Anonymous said...

This is a ridiculous way to be spending money, especially given the harsh economic times. This just highlights the separation from those at the top and those at the bottom struggling to make ends meet. I have been a part of the construction industry with Promax and the last few years have been really tough. There is little demand and governments are doing little increase it, and now we have the ECB blowing lots of money on their new headquarters. What was wrong with their old HQ?